Laura Loomer’s Racist Attack on Rep. Jasmine Crockett Sparks Outrage
- Shalena
- Sep 29
- 2 min read

Whew, chile—the political drama just keeps coming, and this time it’s dripping with racism, misogyny, and everything in between.
Far-right activist Laura Loomer is back in the headlines, and not for anything positive. On September 2025, Loomer unleashed a series of hateful posts on X (formerly Twitter), directly targeting Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas. The reason? Crockett’s refusal to support a U.S. House resolution honoring the late Charlie Kirk, founder of the conservative youth group Turning Point USA. But instead of sticking to politics, Loomer went low—very low.
The Racist, Sexist Remarks
In her tirade, Loomer hurled vile slurs, reportedly calling Crockett a “ghetto Black b***”* and mocking her use of African American Vernacular English (AAVE). The language wasn’t just disrespectful—it was textbook racist and sexist, feeding into centuries-old stereotypes about Black women.
And let’s be clear: Crockett has been a rising star in Congress, known for her sharp comebacks, legal expertise, and unshakable presence on the House floor. Loomer’s decision to target her with racist tropes instead of actual debate says everything about the climate we’re in.

Backlash and Condemnation
Civil rights advocates wasted no time in clapping back. Journalists and activists called out Loomer’s words as “intentional racial antagonism” and “dangerous rhetoric.”
What’s notable is that even some conservatives distanced themselves from Loomer, acknowledging that her remarks went too far. For a figure who’s made a career out of shock value and provocation, this backlash signals that there are still lines—even in today’s polarized political world—that shouldn’t be crossed.
Loomer vs. Crockett: A Brewing Feud
This isn’t the first time the two women have clashed. Crockett, who represents Texas’ 30th Congressional District, has been vocal about racial equity, reproductive rights, and protecting democracy—stances that consistently put her at odds with Loomer and her far-right base.
The resolution for Charlie Kirk was already divisive, with critics arguing that Kirk’s legacy included sowing division and promoting extremist ideologies. Crockett’s opposition made sense politically. Loomer’s reaction, however, turned it into a personal attack drenched in racism.
Why This Matters
This incident is more than online drama—it’s a snapshot of America’s racial and political divides in 2025. We’re in an era where Black women in positions of power often face not just policy disagreements but personal, racist attacks that aim to delegitimize their voices.
It also shows how far-right agitators like Loomer use social media to provoke outrage and dominate the news cycle. But the danger here is real: normalizing this kind of rhetoric puts Black women leaders at greater risk of harassment and violence.
At the end of the day, Rep. Jasmine Crockett is still doing her job in Congress, while Laura Loomer is… well, going viral for all the wrong reasons.
This clash is about more than just one hateful post—it’s about the ongoing struggle for respect, equity, and dignity in American politics. And once again, it’s Black women like Crockett who are forced to carry the weight of these attacks while still showing up to lead.
Stay tuned, because something tells me this feud is far from over.
👉 What do you think? Should Congress censure public figures like Loomer for racist attacks, or does that blur the line of free speech? Drop your thoughts below—let’s talk about it.



Comments